|
Mitch Earwood (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
debunking911 . com /sag . htm^ go to that website and it explains exactly what I am talking about. I can't explain it all in a 400 character-long comment.
giptonsilly (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Oh yea sorry your comment is there its just somebody thinks your a retard and your rantings have been flagged as SPAM which they are basically lol
giptonsilly (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
If the top half broke away what made the rest of the building collapse ? It couldn't act as a pile driver, you have just made your self look a bigger cunt than you already are. 1 collapsing floor wouldn't be enough to crash a whole building to dust. The pancake theory is totally debunked because there was no floors piled on top of each other and no steel core left. The only way that could happen is with explosives. Why can't you see this are you a total retard. DON'T ANSWER I already know lol.
Mitch Earwood (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
You're beyond retarded, look down I posted 2 comments in a row, one of them is to you. IT'S RIGHT there lol, not deleted. But you can go and look at the interviews of the engineers who designed the WTC, they designed them to collapse straight down. And yes, LOOK AT THE VIDEO whenever it collapses you can see the top half above the place where the plane hit tilted sideways and fell at an angle. It's really just not that hard to wrap your mind around and comprehend.
giptonsilly (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Mitch Earwood why did you remove this : Please explain how that's stupid. You just ranted on for 7 lines insulting me yet failed to explain. You must be an engineer considering how you think the building should fall over rather than fall down.I actually trained as a civil engineer many years ago.I'm not familiar with the design structure of these buildings as I'm not in that field anymore but common sense would tell you the top half would fall sideways if it magically failed over the whole floor
Mitch Earwood (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Quite simple, really. Watch the video and how it collapses. The point where the plane hit left a huge gap, or "dent", in the building. When it collapsed, everything above that gap leaned that way due to gravity, which is why it spread out. And thankyou, sir, for not insulting me like all others due when I make a statement such as that. I respect you for that.
Mitch Earwood (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Please explain how that's stupid. You just ranted on for 7 lines insulting me yet failed to explain. You must be an engineer considering how you know SO much about engineering that it would be better for the world's tallest buildings (at the time) to fall over rather than collapse straight down.
giptonsilly (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
OMG Iv heard it all now lol. That is the single most stupid load of bollocks I have ever heard in my life. I'm literally laughing my head off at such a ridiculous remark. So the building was designed to collapse straight down was it ?? I would call that a serious design flaw. Fucking hell everybody in a high rise over 20 story's must be shitting them self the floors above them don't catch fire or it will collapse straight down. You should be a comedian your a funny idiot of the highest caliber
devax1986 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
This was no demolition. Look at any demolition tape. The way they set it up, there are many mini explosions you see up and down the whole tower, a slight delay, then the bottom falls out and the rest of the tower falls. These towers fall directly at the impact point up top. Are you to say that terrorists planted the bombs at the impact site? Gtfo...lol |
