|
supercappuccino (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
@beesleeper actually the bible itself says that it shouldn't be considered as a human being. TAKE THAT CATHOLICS
lancasterKENT (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
I'm just wondering where all of these imaginary adoptive parents are. U know, the ones who are just going 2 leap rite up @ a chance 2 adopt every child... Orphanages & state run homes are full of kids no 1 wants 2 adopt. And Republicans will soon cut funding 2 even those (states being "broke" & all). Republicans. They only care about u if ur unborn. After that, it's "fuck off" unless ur filthy rich.
beesleeper (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
A zygote is not a "person."Not a single scientist, philosopher, medical ethicist or thinker considers a zygotic clump of tissue to be a person with personhood.YOUR BIBLE SHIT DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING...TRY USING FACTS, SCIENCE, REASON, EVIDENCE AND LOGIC
RebelGuy95 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
@PearceCTV, 'protection' fails; women find out, sometimes very late in the pregnancy, that carrying the fetus any longer and or giving birth can kill them.
xXshinzoXx (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
@enevighet17 Wow. You are a douchebag aren't you. It's not "bullshit" as you coined, its explaining how certain individuals is manipulating the masses through lies, and this video further informs the audience on the health care reform bill, and how it does NOT affect abortions, which some conservatives might be lenient on. But for fuckwits like you, ignorance is bliss isn't it? With your mentality, everything that isn't your cup of tea is "liberal bullshit" that "wastes yoru time" FUCK YOU.
kruset11 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
@kruset11 so I'm trying to say it is pretty good
kruset11 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
tyt= unfunny daily show
enevighet17 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
In a five minute clip, TYT could not produce one single counterargument. ^^ Thanks a lot for wasting my time with this liberal bullshit!
WarThemedRevolution (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
@TheSaltyAdmiral During the video they showed a clip in which an individual did just what you are asking and they never rebutted his argument. They just called him a liar and said that you can easily rebut his argument. But if you can do so, why didn't they? I'm not joining in on either side but why should more argumentor citations be thrown in when the first ones are not even being regarded?
kingarthurup (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
read the bill you idiots. |
