|
saalanc (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
RIP, John... you and your work will not be forgotten.
bweazel (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
@clarkdef And in case you're too lazy: "Kanzius admitted that this process could not be considered an energy source, as more energy is used to produce the RF signal than can be obtained from the burning gas and stated in July 2007 that he never claimed his discovery would replace oil, asserting only that his discovery was 'thought provoking.'" (Ogden, Shannon (2007-07-05). "Salt Water Fuel". First Coast News.)
bweazel (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
@clarkdef How can you all read the quote from the inventor himself, saying it is not an alternative to oil and it takes more power to run it than it gives you back in power, and still reply to me arguing against the inventor. It's ridiculous. I'll say it again, I will take the inventors word over yours any day of the week.
bweazel (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
@frank0067 No, it is not much more than you see here. It's just that. Using a shit ton of radio waves to break down water. I like how you smart guys come on here behaving as though there is some secret use to this guys invention which he said cannot be used the way you are saying it can. Sorry. Like I told the last guy. Go take your meds.
clarkdef (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
@bweazel But nah don't agree with the powering it argument, a typical alternator uses about 2-4hp to run properly and is capable of producing over 2000watts
clarkdef (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
@bweazel Must use a lot of power, I have gotten a lawnmower which is 4hp to power my 54" tv. I think that the fuel could work or be viable if it could be made to not burn so hot so not a good idea to dismiss something you know little about. But yeah I would say that not being viable would be 1. freq not responding well within cyclinder. 2. flame burning too hot for use within engine.
bweazel (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
@clarkdef Haha, well, I'll go with what the inventor of the machine said. And he said that it is not a viable energy source. His actual quote is on here a couple pages back, I think you should read it. Wrong, more energy is required to power the machine than the energy it gives back, but ok, I'll let you think you know what you're talking about.
clarkdef (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
@bweazel I don't wana spark you off again lol but this idea will work. Once the engine starts the radio wave generator will be powered by the engine.
frank0067 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
@bweazel ya just as i thought a social sheep who follows others never understanding anything for yourself..most folks who make a religion of their concept of science..i find have No idea what science even means ...btw there are solar powered ham radios .. battery.. you name it.its vey difficult to show someone that their long held perception of the world isnt the way it is at all and there are many who fall into that.
fubar66 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
how Ironic that he died of cancer :/ |
